Competitions & evaluations
Weblet GPT competitions provide a structured way to compare approaches, prompts, and outputs. Each competition has clearly defined rules, criteria, and timelines, with recognition and sometimes cash prizes for the strongest submissions.
Active competitions
6
Completed competitions
0
Total submissions evaluated
0
Structured, transparent evaluation
Competitions are designed for scientists and technical teams who want more than a leaderboard. Submissions are judged using written criteria, often along multiple dimensions such as product quality and prompt design.
- Organizers publish scope, rules, and evaluation criteria before submissions open.
- Participants work in dedicated competition chats with the specified Weblet configuration.
- Submissions include a concise title and optional methodology notes describing how the result was produced.
- After judging, a leaderboard summarizes results and evaluator feedback highlights strengths and areas for improvement.
Typical competition timeline
- 1
Announcement
Organizers publish the problem statement, baseline, and evaluation criteria.
- 2
Experimentation
Participants iterate in competition chats with the relevant Weblets.
- 3
Submission
Final entries are submitted before the deadline with optional methodology notes.
- 4
Judging & results
Evaluators score submissions and publish rankings, feedback, and any associated prizes.
Active competitions
Sign in to participate and submit entries.
Recently completed
Explore past competitions and their evaluation structure.
For now, the best way to get started is to sign up, explore existing Weblets, and reach out through your usual channel if you're interested in organizing a structured evaluation.